PocketQuake Developers Topic?!

[Robotbeat]

Can we have one? We need one so that we don't have little kiddies asking for Quake on their Palms and stuff in the middle of a thread. How about it? You said you would!!! (You know, only "special people" can post in it, or maybe even view it?)

[Jaybot]

Learn C++ first, then do the fixed point conversions, then learn mips asm, and then do the mips asm conversions for quake.

And then it'll be considered.

I don't think there is really a need for it, considering nobody is really developing for it at the moment, or anytime soon.

As soon as someone actually steps up and makes a huge difference from v.062 and puts out (i.e. actually does it, and releases it), then it might be considered.

There is too much, 'Hey! I've got a great idea for a game! I know some apple basic, and I'm leaning eVB, and I read an article on C+ once, so give me a forum!' lately.

And there is also too much, 'Okie dokie, we'll give you something for free, before you've even proven yourself or shown anything!' from pmatrix as well.

This needs to stop.

[Robotbeat]

Both your examples seem to directly refer to me...

[Robotbeat]

And I'm not defending myself, either. Constructive criticism is just that... constructive.

[Robotbeat]

However, Chris or Matt did promise a forum for PocketQuake developers.

[Matt Keys]

promise? bah..I think we asked if they wanted one..

[Paul]

just join the developer group and post a topic to the group.

[Robotbeat]

I don't think we can do that.

BTW, your avatar is really funny, Matt. It just seems strange to imagine you as a fat, donut-eating policeman...

[Matt Keys]

hehe, thanks

[esw]

[Robotbeat]

[James S]