Do we assume the concept of greater meaning before asking if it is there? In terms of the evolution of this concept, are we inherently prone to becoming a slave to our own ideas about purpose, or do we first choose to accept the concept of meaning as our servant (a child accepting religion as a method of normalizing with his surroundings) and we become so dependant upon it that the roles are soon reversed?
Do we ask about a meaning in an existence without one? Is assuming the concept of greater meaning like assuming the concept of a higher power (the being to which greater meaning is usually tied)? In the end, do we find ourself investing energy (perhaps, even our lives) in something that never was?
We assume greater meaning and a deity, then vest them with power over our actions. They become real in the sense that matters (they have an active effect on the reality perceived). They are products of our desires, filtered through an impure lense provided by the self, polluted by others, distorted over time: that which was once our desire, our need to control and take, is transformed into a yoke.