by sandmann » Jul 13, 2006 @ 11:27pm
There are two types of reality. The first -- things in themselves -- is almost completely inaccessible to us. The second -- our perceptive reality -- is, as Moose said, highly subjective.
The first kind of reality is something we cannot possibly experience. For example, everything we see doesn't actually look like that. It doesn't even look like anything. The act of seeing is just a series of (inaccurate) renditions of information; the light wave bounces off the object and hits our eyes, our eyes translate the light wave into an electrical signal which they then pass to our brain, our brain interprets this signal as it flashes across the neurons, makes a number of modifications, and then displays the image to our consciousness. There is very little real relation between the object in itself and our image of it.
Now, as for the second reality, we make that reality. Reality is what you make of what happens to you. You make reality, you construct it. Let’s say you get lost on a cross-country drive. You are either pissed off that you got lost, frustrated by your lack of direction, cursing your wrong turn, or you celebrate your lack of direction, you savor the mystery. It depends on which way you look at it. You can hate your life, or you can love your life – you can do either, even with the same life. Reality is a function of perspective, of attitude. You can’t change what happens to you – at least not directly – but you can change your perception of it, and thus your reality.
Even more than that, we construct our reality in a very literal way. I already described the construction of the images we see. We construct that. We impose certain structures on the world around us -- causality, time, space, individuation, etc. We structure our lives, we edit. When someone asks us what we did this morning, we don't say "Well, I woke up, I stretched my hands, then I stretched my legs, then I yawned, then I swung my legs around, then I stepped down on the ground, etc..." We edit out details we believe to be irrelevant, and we include what we believe to be significant. Is our narration in accord with "reality?" Not in the sense that we didn't convey literally every rotation of every electron around every nucleus that morning -- but it represents the germane details.
That's what reality is.
The fates lead him who will;
Him who won't, they drag.
Seneca