Page 3 of 4

PostPosted: Apr 26, 2007 @ 6:31am
by Brig

PostPosted: Apr 26, 2007 @ 7:42am
by Caesar

PostPosted: Apr 26, 2007 @ 2:59pm
by sponge

PostPosted: Apr 30, 2007 @ 3:10am
by RICoder
Foriegn news sorces are worse, not better. The idea that they are some how superior or not biased is part of the disease that is self-loathing. It's hilariously hypocrytical...nationalism is bad for Americans and good for everyone else, tolerance is grand unless it is tolerance of American culture. Buy our clothes, our music, our technology, our food...oh, and call us for a hand when you need it...but only do so if you hate the Americans.

I've travelled around the world, and across the U.S. There is more diversity (that oh-so-sought-after-cure-all) across this country than there is across most of Europe, especially when it comes to world-view. Europe is caught in a liberal cyclone, divided against itself. The media in Europe is a joke, its completely homogeneous and anti-American.

You can hate Fox news all you want, and speak of its evils, but it is no more conservative than the other outlets are liberal. At LEAST there is diversity of thought.

If you want to know what is going on in the world, you need to read as many sources as you can, and try to divine the truth...its usually in there somewhere.

PostPosted: Apr 30, 2007 @ 12:41pm
by Dan East
Not to beat a dead horse or anything:


Dan East

PostPosted: May 2, 2007 @ 3:59am
by sponge
Not even that, though. I watch Fox News, CNN, have the Christian Science Monitor and BBC on my Google homepage. There's nothing wrong with variable sources.

Anyone who buys into the blogger/YouTube journalist is just a dumbass though. http://digg.com/ should show you how that styupid shit works

PostPosted: May 2, 2007 @ 1:17pm
by refractor

PostPosted: May 2, 2007 @ 1:33pm
by refractor

PostPosted: May 2, 2007 @ 11:43pm
by RICoder

PostPosted: May 3, 2007 @ 1:10am
by Brig

PostPosted: May 3, 2007 @ 10:27am
by RICoder

PostPosted: May 6, 2007 @ 2:56am
by Brig

PostPosted: May 18, 2007 @ 6:22am
by Brig
After watching the first two debates:

Rudy is a rat and is a broken record when it comes to saying variants of "9/11".

McCain and Romney are both flip-floppers.

The only worthwhile candidate is Ron Paul.

PostPosted: May 20, 2007 @ 8:38am
by sponge
I've been hearing that a bit lately, can't be assed to care this early on.

PostPosted: May 20, 2007 @ 9:22pm
by Brig
The Republican primaries are probably going to be the most interesting part of the election. What's evident at this point is the control that the party elite and the mainstream media have over who gets the nod in the primary.

When Ron Paul is on the stage with other "conservatives" it is apparent how authoritarian, backward, and paranoid the party has become. They're like children who have been telling ghost stories so long that they've come to believe them.

I won't like the idea of choosing between an authoritarian and a socialist once both parties have chosen their candidate; still, I find the process compelling. I can't help it. The next GOP debate is in New Hampshire on the fifth of June.