Re:

[Dan East]

I checked the site out a couple days ago, and looked carefully for anything denoting shareware / freeware / demo, etc, and found nothing at all to indicate that fact.<br><br>Of course as a programmer I want to fully protect my rights. However I think any court would find it reasonable for a company to charge a fee to collect, archive and distribute "freely distributable" software. They are simply performing a service and saving their customers effort. Take the somewhat related example of GNU source code. I could have charged a reasonable processing, handling and media fee ($25 for example) for the Pocket Quake source code, and distributed it only on CD-ROM.<br><br>Dan East

[Luciano U. Werner]

I went back there and found this:<br><br>"Recently, there are many discussions about our Mega collections over the internet discussion boards. All products featured in our collections are freeware, shareware or trial/demo-versions. There is no single commercial/retail version. Our products reach many users who want to save their time from searching and downloading the latest Pocket PC software..."<br><br>I'm almost sure this wasn't there before.