Gang Warfare

by **damian** » Oct 17, 2002 @ 9:55pm

Why is it better?

If you're talking about it graphics-wise, you can always get jDoom...

by **FLiPsTa_G** » Oct 17, 2002 @ 10:17pm

Quake has better graphics than that jdoom.

by **refractor** » Oct 18, 2002 @ 12:56am

by **Matthew** » Oct 18, 2002 @ 3:20am

by **(TSC)Bender** » Oct 18, 2002 @ 5:22am

You rich punk

When Doom 3 comes out, I will need to upgrade my P3 and Geforce 4 to get 30 fps or higher. I have a good feeling that it won't come out next year

Also, Doom 3 is going to play differently than the regular Doom. No more "50 imps, 2 cyberdemons" type thing. From the looks of it, youll be lucky to see 5 guys at once.

There's also a 10 page preview of Doom 3 in the PC Gamer Mag. Seeing the a development model vs the ingame wireframe model is disappointing. Theres a pretty low poly count on the characters, but a hell of a lot of bump-mapping. Oh well, still looks good.

by **HobbesAB** » Oct 18, 2002 @ 7:19am

by **sponge** » Oct 18, 2002 @ 12:49pm

by **damian** » Oct 18, 2002 @ 1:35pm

Um.... jDoom has WAY better graphics than Quake. Don't just look at the screenshots; download it along with the model pack. Not many of the screenshots show everything; only a few show the 3D models.

Yes, it still has the limitations of the original Doom engine; however, Doom DID allow non-orthogonal walls. Don't know where you got that from. It uses real 3D, though, so you can turn on mouselook if you want and not have any distortion such as in ZDoom.

Try it; trust me, you'll love it.

by **Mechcommander** » Oct 18, 2002 @ 3:36pm

by **Matthew** » Oct 18, 2002 @ 9:06pm

by **James S** » Oct 18, 2002 @ 11:18pm

by **sponge** » Oct 18, 2002 @ 11:34pm

Gang Warfare

Sort

Forum Description

Moderators:

Forum permissions