Page 1 of 1
Asus Screen Quality.
Posted:
Mar 23, 2003 @ 1:36pmby Ben The Rider
I'm wondering what is the quality of the Asus A600 (Zayo)screen compared to other devices like the latest Ipaq or the Dell Axim.
Is there only a brightness difference or in the contrast also ?
Thanks.
Ben.
Posted:
Mar 23, 2003 @ 4:48pmby James S
Posted:
Mar 23, 2003 @ 5:14pmby HobbesAB
If James is correct (and I have no reason to believe otherwise as he seems quite knowledgeable), then the Asus screen is nowhere near as good as the latest offerings from Ipaq and Dell. These have a transflective screen and are absolutely a joy to behold.
Posted:
Mar 23, 2003 @ 8:40pmby James S
But Asus is releasing new devices very soon, I'm sure these will use transflective displays like the iPaq and Dell devices currently utilize.
Posted:
Mar 23, 2003 @ 8:46pmby jongjungbu
If you are not currently using a transreflective screen, it prolly won't make much of a difference. But if you are moving from one to the current Asus models...then it's possible you will not be pleased with the display. I for one have no qualms about the quality of my display on my Zayo. Looks superb to me. However, I have never owned an iPaq or Dell Axim.
JJB
Okay
Posted:
Mar 23, 2003 @ 9:30pmby Ben The Rider
Posted:
Mar 24, 2003 @ 5:08amby (TSC)Bender
Posted:
Mar 24, 2003 @ 6:21amby James S
That's what transflective is, a combination of transmorphous and reflective. *sigh*
Posted:
Mar 24, 2003 @ 6:41amby damian
Transmorphous? You mean transmissive? Transmorphous is an interesting word, though, I have to admit.
Posted:
Mar 24, 2003 @ 6:54amby James S
anamorphous is probably the correct term, but I wanted to use trans, so I just changed the word
Posted:
Mar 24, 2003 @ 10:55pmby (TSC)Bender
Posted:
Mar 24, 2003 @ 11:04pmby fforna
Posted:
Mar 25, 2003 @ 12:26amby Dihnekis
Posted:
Mar 25, 2003 @ 12:59amby James S
I cook eggs on my H3955.