Page 1 of 2
Tactical RPGs

Posted:
Dec 7, 2003 @ 8:48am
by Brig

Posted:
Dec 7, 2003 @ 9:25am
by Kuhout

Posted:
Dec 7, 2003 @ 9:31am
by Brig

Posted:
Dec 7, 2003 @ 10:46am
by x999x
Until Warcraft III: TFT comes to the pocketPC (never), Tactics Ogre on SuperFamicom is all I need on my PPC :)
RTS > Turn Based anyway...

Posted:
Dec 7, 2003 @ 12:03pm
by Markdh

Posted:
Dec 7, 2003 @ 12:05pm
by Brig

Posted:
Dec 7, 2003 @ 1:42pm
by Andy
I'm surprised menu-driven RPGs like the non-tactics Final Fantasies are still around. Strat RPGs seem like natural evolution from them because they add a another variable to the battle system -- a very complex variable with a lot of fun/challenging implications.
So you can not only have the story of the classical RPGs, but some challenge too. The original FF:Tactics was a masterpiece in that respect. One of the best storylines ever, and it had a battle system with some depth. FFTA, on the other hand, was a crime. Zero challenge, and a zero of a story.
To paraphrase: there is huge potential in the strat-RPG genre (which for some reason doesn't seem to be as big in the US as it does in other countries).

Posted:
Dec 7, 2003 @ 3:27pm
by Markdh
and how the ff comunity called for a proper sequel to fft, In many ways it would have been better if they hadn't bothered. The system is too complex for kids and the characters are too childish to be engrosing for anyone over 12 years old.

Posted:
Dec 7, 2003 @ 3:36pm
by Brig
Is it just me, or is FFTA's story a rip-off of The Neverending Story?

Posted:
Dec 7, 2003 @ 4:02pm
by Markdh
the whole entering the book stuff is a real cliche.
Almost as bad as "oh it was a dream- but how come i still have...."
or even "i was being controlled by an evil force and didn't mean to kill your friends"

Posted:
Dec 7, 2003 @ 5:05pm
by Michael Y

Posted:
Dec 7, 2003 @ 5:44pm
by Brig

Posted:
Dec 7, 2003 @ 7:36pm
by MoelBrain

Posted:
Dec 7, 2003 @ 7:51pm
by Raynne

Posted:
Dec 7, 2003 @ 11:18pm
by Markdh