Page 1 of 2
SD vs MMC

Posted:
Mar 15, 2004 @ 9:11pm
by jpxdude

Posted:
Mar 15, 2004 @ 9:23pm
by Chad

Posted:
Mar 15, 2004 @ 9:26pm
by tomdon

Posted:
Mar 15, 2004 @ 9:27pm
by Chad

Posted:
Mar 15, 2004 @ 10:17pm
by jpxdude
Thanks for the feedback, I appreciate it :) Was just wondering, does the SD cards use anymore power thank an MMC card?

Posted:
Mar 15, 2004 @ 10:19pm
by beanburito
I think they do


Posted:
Mar 17, 2004 @ 8:31am
by saurabh
Not to forget that the SD card will perform better in terms of speed as compared to an MMC card, try running a game from it and you will see the difference

Posted:
Mar 17, 2004 @ 1:51pm
by jpxdude
Heres something I found out that should interest you peeps :)
Transfer Rates:
MMC = ~2.5mb/s
SD = ~10mb/s
CF = ~ 0.15mb/s
note, the CF rating is for a 1x card, which are pretty much not used anymore, the average speeds are about 12x which are equivalent to
12 x 0.15mb/s = 1.8
so when you see the 40x cards, it means 40 x 0.15mb/s = ~6mb!
Seems like SD is the way forward for now :P

Posted:
Mar 17, 2004 @ 1:59pm
by Blade Runner
I don't think SD are that fast...


Posted:
Mar 17, 2004 @ 4:21pm
by someone somebody

Posted:
Mar 17, 2004 @ 5:42pm
by Guest

Posted:
Mar 18, 2004 @ 10:54am
by saurabh

Posted:
Mar 21, 2004 @ 5:33am
by Guest

Posted:
Mar 21, 2004 @ 5:34am
by Guest

Posted:
Mar 21, 2004 @ 6:19am
by Chad