Page 1 of 3

HP H1940/1945

PostPosted: Apr 4, 2004 @ 8:06pm
by jun412

PostPosted: Apr 4, 2004 @ 9:45pm
by Blade Runner

PostPosted: Apr 4, 2004 @ 9:46pm
by PeeK

PostPosted: Apr 4, 2004 @ 10:22pm
by jun412

PostPosted: Apr 4, 2004 @ 10:41pm
by HP defender

PostPosted: Apr 4, 2004 @ 11:35pm
by Guest

PostPosted: Apr 4, 2004 @ 11:38pm
by Ron

PostPosted: Apr 5, 2004 @ 12:03am
by Blade Runner

PostPosted: Apr 5, 2004 @ 1:25am
by Chad

PostPosted: Apr 5, 2004 @ 2:30am
by Maf54

PostPosted: Apr 5, 2004 @ 4:05am
by sponge

PostPosted: Apr 5, 2004 @ 4:53am
by spiral

PostPosted: Apr 5, 2004 @ 4:53am
by RChickenMan

PostPosted: Apr 5, 2004 @ 12:55pm
by Blade Runner
Well there's something I must admit about the Ipaq 1910 (or 1945, we're talking about both of them), it's the size....I like it. But the multiple button press issue was on the Toshiba I think, not on Ipaqs. Sorry.

PostPosted: Apr 5, 2004 @ 2:23pm
by brn
Hi, I'm also thinking about h1945. I know that it's fast enough to play WMV videos, but can it play DivX or MPG smoothly? These formats are more sophisticated and they might need more processor speed... I also heard that videos res must be optimized for 240x320 screen (otherwise the iPaq has to recalculate pixels and the playback will be snatchy).

I would buy A620BT, but it's larger and the iPaq has veeeeerrrryyy NICE DESIGN. Maybe I'll go for h4150.