Page 1 of 2
Casio EM-500 vs Ipaq
Posted:
Dec 3, 2001 @ 8:03amby Trenchtown007
I bought my Casio on the Net for half the price of your regular Ipaq... My memory cards are way cooler and since Palm also switched to MMC format they'll get cheaper in no time...<br><br>And I hear the Ipaq screen sucks. Kind of an easy choice ey?<br>
Re: Casio EM-500 vs Ipaq
Posted:
Dec 3, 2001 @ 11:22amby Luciano U. Werner
Thank you for the info.
Re: Casio EM-500 vs Ipaq
Posted:
Dec 3, 2001 @ 5:41pmby Matt Keys
You guys crack me up.
Re: Casio EM-500 vs Ipaq
Posted:
Dec 3, 2001 @ 5:51pmby RwGast
Wow your so cool. So hows the slow piece of crap working out for you? You know you could have at least bought an e-125 then and only maybe then would i say your casio was even compareable to my ipaqs supperior speed.
Re: Casio EM-500 vs Ipaq
Posted:
Dec 3, 2001 @ 6:22pmby Jaybot
uhmmm, except for the fact that the em500 is the exact same speed as the e-125; which can both be oc'ed to 200mhz. only diff is the cf slot and the 32mb ram.
Re: Casio EM-500 vs Ipaq
Posted:
Dec 3, 2001 @ 8:06pmby Jaybot
agreed.<br><br>the poor sap forgot to mention that the MIPS processor in his EM500 will only be suported for about 6 more months before it dies like the PSPCs did.
Re: Casio EM-500 vs Ipaq
Posted:
Dec 3, 2001 @ 8:12pmby RwGast
oh, im sorry i thought the e-500 was slower. I guess not it just has less ram, i knew there was somthing that made the e-125 better. Still there is no need to post shit when your talking out your ass based on a personal opinion.
Re: Casio EM-500 vs Ipaq
Posted:
Dec 3, 2001 @ 8:13pmby RwGast
!NotNew@EvilBugs.com
Re: Casio EM-500 vs Ipaq
Posted:
Dec 11, 2001 @ 9:21amby Dan East
6 months? You're generous, Jaybot.
<br><br>Dan East
Re: Casio EM-500 vs Ipaq
Posted:
Dec 11, 2001 @ 9:27amby Paul
whats with the pic he posted?
Re: Casio EM-500 vs Ipaq
Posted:
Dec 11, 2001 @ 2:58pmby RwGast
probably a picuture of himself, the ass.
Re: Casio EM-500 vs Ipaq
Posted:
Dec 11, 2001 @ 3:26pmby Luciano U. Werner
Guys, give the poor sob a break. With that face he has to get a Palm.
Re: Casio EM-500 vs Ipaq
Posted:
Dec 11, 2001 @ 4:49pmby RwGast
That was good
Re: Casio EM-500 vs Ipaq
Posted:
Dec 14, 2001 @ 4:14pmby OlManRivah
The mips thingy is irrevelant.....anything you own today will be obsolete in 6 months.<br><br>I just prefer an obsolete E125....lol!
Re: Casio EM-500 vs Ipaq
Posted:
Dec 30, 2001 @ 11:20amby Robby
i have an em500. I'd rather have an E125 an day for CF and 32megs. Personally i dont like normal ipaqs, but the new one is good.<br>That guy is just a fool