Page 1 of 1
wierd benchmarks
Posted:
May 6, 2002 @ 5:59amby Jadam
... ok
How come in lots of VObenchmarks, the Casio E-200 does so much better than all the other PocketPC's in the graphics department???? are they really any different in say PocketQuake or in emulators??? they get like 60, while iPaqs get like 6 or something, heh, my vox gets 13!!!
Posted:
May 6, 2002 @ 9:30pmby James S
Posted:
May 6, 2002 @ 9:31pmby R0B
Posted:
May 6, 2002 @ 10:53pmby James S
Ya, the speed at which a device blits to the display isn't all important. And the speed at which it can draw triangles and text doesn't matter at all, unless you want to play Poccer!
*everyone laughs*
Posted:
May 7, 2002 @ 3:47amby TechMage
*at Moose's stupidity*
Posted:
May 7, 2002 @ 4:37amby Jadam
would there be any difference though??? the ipaqs/ all of them/ scored 8.5 , the Maestro/e570/HP 568 scored 12.15, and the NEC/Casio E-200 scored 57. in GFX speed. is there really any difference
Posted:
May 7, 2002 @ 6:16pmby ingallsj
The most deceiving benchmark is the battery life one. They must test it on minimum backlight while just sitting there with the Today screen only.
Posted:
May 7, 2002 @ 8:58pmby accolon
Posted:
May 7, 2002 @ 9:21pmby ingallsj