Pocket Pc vs. Pocket Pc 2002

by **SiGen** » Feb 5, 2003 @ 3:35am

well, i can seriously say that windows98SE is a lot better than Windows Millenium, and Windows2000 better than XP home...

i have never used for long a PPC2000 device, but seems like PPC2002 is just an improvement, without more bugs than fixes. i think...

by **sponge** » Feb 5, 2003 @ 4:07am

by **damian** » Feb 5, 2003 @ 4:09am

by **James S** » Feb 5, 2003 @ 5:33am

Ya. The only real difference is that it's StrongARM only and that it has themes support.

by **damian** » Feb 5, 2003 @ 5:46am

ARM only, not StrongARM only. And there are many small improvements, not just themse.

by **Cameron** » Feb 5, 2003 @ 1:52pm

by **James S** » Feb 5, 2003 @ 5:03pm

Oh, ya, MSN Messenger built in, too. Sarrrree!

by **Solarix** » Feb 5, 2003 @ 5:19pm

The only advantage any PPC00 device has in playing games is the Casio E-125. It had the ideal D-Pad on the left, App buttons on the right, ala GameBoy Setup. Other than that, the pure support for StrongARM devices are so much better. And don't even think about considering the insanely flawed iPaq 36xx/37xx series.

But then again, since I did the 1.10 Rom update on my iPaq 3950, the speed was decreased down to 300mhz so.... who knows?

Pocket Pc vs. Pocket Pc 2002

Pocket Pc vs. Pocket Pc 2002

Sort

Forum Description

Moderators:

Forum permissions