Pocket Pc vs. Pocket Pc 2002
Posted: Feb 5, 2003 @ 1:15ami have never used for long a PPC2000 device, but seems like PPC2002 is just an improvement, without more bugs than fixes. i think...
PocketMatrix
Mobile device developer community
http://pocketmatrix.com/forums/
Pocket Pc vs. Pocket Pc 2002
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Feb 5, 2003 @ 1:15amPosted: Feb 5, 2003 @ 1:37amPosted: Feb 5, 2003 @ 1:55amPosted: Feb 5, 2003 @ 3:35amwell, i can seriously say that windows98SE is a lot better than Windows Millenium, and Windows2000 better than XP home...
i have never used for long a PPC2000 device, but seems like PPC2002 is just an improvement, without more bugs than fixes. i think...
i have never used for long a PPC2000 device, but seems like PPC2002 is just an improvement, without more bugs than fixes. i think...
Posted: Feb 5, 2003 @ 4:07amPosted: Feb 5, 2003 @ 4:09amPosted: Feb 5, 2003 @ 5:33amYa. The only real difference is that it's StrongARM only and that it has themes support.
Posted: Feb 5, 2003 @ 5:46amARM only, not StrongARM only. And there are many small improvements, not just themse.
Posted: Feb 5, 2003 @ 1:52pmPosted: Feb 5, 2003 @ 5:03pmOh, ya, MSN Messenger built in, too. Sarrrree!
Posted: Feb 5, 2003 @ 5:19pmThe only advantage any PPC00 device has in playing games is the Casio E-125. It had the ideal D-Pad on the left, App buttons on the right, ala GameBoy Setup. Other than that, the pure support for StrongARM devices are so much better. And don't even think about considering the insanely flawed iPaq 36xx/37xx series.
But then again, since I did the 1.10 Rom update on my iPaq 3950, the speed was decreased down to 300mhz so.... who knows?
But then again, since I did the 1.10 Rom update on my iPaq 3950, the speed was decreased down to 300mhz so.... who knows?