HTML vs. Editors

by **sponge** » Oct 28, 2003 @ 9:31pm

But HTML really isn't programming like C++ and so on is. Hell, HTML shouldn't even be used to layout, it was made as a way to specify formatting, not something strict.

by **Maf54** » Oct 28, 2003 @ 10:42pm

by **Caesar** » Oct 28, 2003 @ 10:46pm

by **Maf54** » Oct 28, 2003 @ 10:54pm

by **James S** » Oct 28, 2003 @ 11:51pm

EditPad Lite is my personal favorite.

I made http://www.new-life.us completely with Notepad, though.

by **x999x** » Oct 29, 2003 @ 12:09am

I can respect people who prefer to code their pages. I would associate those people in being proficient at Math, and other analitical facets of life.

On the other hand, I believe there are visual people, whom are more tactile than the aforementioned. I am one of these people, and although I can understand the html, I can get a better visual of the outcome by working in a WYSIWYG. It is by no means better than an Editor, but it does allow me to work in a manner which is more conducive to my work environments like Photoshop, Quark, Image Ready and so on. My graphic applications do not require me to code where I want pixels displayed, so I would prefer that my HTML authoring program follow suit to streamline my workflow.

It all comes down to workflow in the real world of design, and for me, a wysiwyg is what keeps my pace jumping from application to application, and that keeps my clients happy.

by **damian** » Oct 29, 2003 @ 1:33am

by **ktemkin** » Oct 29, 2003 @ 2:27am

HTML vs. Editors

Sort

Forum Description

Moderators:

Forum permissions