This site is no longer active and is available for archival purposes only. Registration and login is disabled.

a betatron


Postby Cameron » Oct 24, 2002 @ 11:49pm

Or that coffey is hot.
<a href="http://www.therockboat.com/" ><img src="http://www2.pdai.org/cam/trb.gif" /></a>
User avatar
Cameron
pm Insider
 
Posts: 2352
Joined: Nov 22, 2001 @ 12:58pm
Location: Indianapolis, Indiana


Postby Digital Chaos » Oct 25, 2002 @ 12:55am

If you yelled for 8 years, 7 months and 6 days, you would have produced enough sound energy to heat one cup of coffee.

If you fart consistently for 6 years and 9 months, enough gas is produced to create the energy of an atomic bomb.
User avatar
Digital Chaos
pm Member
 
Posts: 154
Joined: Aug 22, 2002 @ 10:42pm
Location: 1986, Vice City


Postby RICoder » Oct 25, 2002 @ 2:15am

Or that spell coffee as coffey ;)
<iframe src="http://gamercard.xbox.com/RICoder.card" scrolling="no" frameBorder="0" height="140" width="204">RICoder</iframe>
User avatar
RICoder
FOX News Correspondent
 
Posts: 3948
Joined: Jul 10, 2001 @ 1:48pm
Location: the matrix has me


Postby TechMage » Oct 25, 2002 @ 3:15am

I'm not a tree hugger RICoder. I just give a damn about the human race. Maybe most of you are smart ass science wizards, but if you would get your ignorant heads out of your butts and study a little history then maybe you would respect mankind and all that it has achieved. Most of you have no idea what you have and what it has cost our ancestors to get it. A nuclear war could destroy thousands of years of invention and everything else that we hold dear as humans (literature, philosophy, religion, science, art, etc). Just because we can do something (like make nuclear bombs, have abortions, cut down rain forests, etc), doesn't mean we should. It's sad that we abouse and pollute science with our own agendas like money and power. Oh, well. We will change, or we will destroy ourselves. Whichever comes first.


This is OT but related to my point. Recently there have been alot of focus on weither or not cell phones cause cancer. There are pros and cons to the arguement, but I just read this on yahoo news yesterday. I guess some scientists found out that radio waves from cell phones accellerate the growth of cancerous cells (it fucks up the RNA code of a cell). They don't know yet what they do to healthy cells. But a previous study by some other scientists said that cell phones do not cause cancer at all(in animals at least). If cell phones prove to be cancerous, then that is going to seriously effect the cell phone industry. Over the past 10 years cell phones have become more and more popular.

I recently noticed that a few cell phone companies are offering unlimited time. Now, it's common knowledge that analog phones emit radiation all the time (that's why almost all cell phones are digital now) and cell phones emit radiation in pulses. Weither you are using an analog or digital phone, spening 20 or more hours a week (which is what the phone companies encourage people to do, with "any time minutes") on a cell phone, blasting radiation in your head is stupid! I don't care if popular science agrees says that it is harmfull or not. The fact is that you are putting radiation in your head and thus your brain. It's common knowledge that we take in enough radiation from the earth and sun, why the hell would we want to expose ourselves to more of it? It's all about $money$, and the general consumer is stupid enough to believe everything they are told. People in general are sheep and a few are shepards and wolves. What are you? I love technology (hence "Tech"Mage) like anybody else, but sometimes just because we can do something in science, doesn't mean we should.
User avatar
TechMage
pm Insider
 
Posts: 2223
Joined: Sep 16, 2001 @ 5:40pm
Location: In Your Head


Postby James S » Oct 25, 2002 @ 3:42am

Cell phones don't cause cancer, that's stupid. One guy just wanted a law suit, that's ALL.
<img src="http://home.comcast.net/~sonne/james/tag.gif">
James S
pm Insider
 
Posts: 17064
Joined: Jan 12, 2002 @ 2:33pm
Location: Lexington, KY


Postby Jadam » Oct 25, 2002 @ 4:38am

User avatar
Jadam
I'm a STAR!
 
Posts: 3245
Joined: Apr 9, 2002 @ 7:24pm
Location: Stony Brook, NY


Postby RICoder » Oct 25, 2002 @ 4:52am

<iframe src="http://gamercard.xbox.com/RICoder.card" scrolling="no" frameBorder="0" height="140" width="204">RICoder</iframe>
User avatar
RICoder
FOX News Correspondent
 
Posts: 3948
Joined: Jul 10, 2001 @ 1:48pm
Location: the matrix has me


Postby TechMage » Oct 25, 2002 @ 6:51am

User avatar
TechMage
pm Insider
 
Posts: 2223
Joined: Sep 16, 2001 @ 5:40pm
Location: In Your Head


Postby James S » Oct 25, 2002 @ 2:43pm

<img src="http://home.comcast.net/~sonne/james/tag.gif">
James S
pm Insider
 
Posts: 17064
Joined: Jan 12, 2002 @ 2:33pm
Location: Lexington, KY


Postby Jadam » Oct 25, 2002 @ 6:57pm

User avatar
Jadam
I'm a STAR!
 
Posts: 3245
Joined: Apr 9, 2002 @ 7:24pm
Location: Stony Brook, NY


Postby Cameron » Oct 25, 2002 @ 7:16pm

<a href="http://www.therockboat.com/" ><img src="http://www2.pdai.org/cam/trb.gif" /></a>
User avatar
Cameron
pm Insider
 
Posts: 2352
Joined: Nov 22, 2001 @ 12:58pm
Location: Indianapolis, Indiana


Postby RICoder » Oct 25, 2002 @ 7:52pm

<iframe src="http://gamercard.xbox.com/RICoder.card" scrolling="no" frameBorder="0" height="140" width="204">RICoder</iframe>
User avatar
RICoder
FOX News Correspondent
 
Posts: 3948
Joined: Jul 10, 2001 @ 1:48pm
Location: the matrix has me


Postby David Horn » Oct 25, 2002 @ 9:34pm

Nuclear Fission uses approx. 1/10,000 of the energy locked up in the nucleus of an atom. Fusion is much better because (theoretically) there are no hazardous by-products, or even hazardout materials to start with. Two hydrogens are fused into one helium atom and this releases an enormous amount of energy.

It's actually what keeps the sun burning. Jadam actually explained the actual physics of it extremely well.

However, it is doubtful that we'll ever achieve reliable nuclear fission in the long run, simply because of the enormous pressure needed to fuse the atoms, initially this will make fusion unreliable.

In some cases, fusion CANNOT be controlled. Uncontrolled fusion is how a hydrogen bomb works... but a hydrogen bomb is again highly inefficient.
Crosswind technique: "Using your peripheral vision, react to body movements, gasps, groans, and shouts from the other side of the cockpit, and always remember that it's better to be lucky than good."
User avatar
David Horn
<b>The Boss</b>
 
Posts: 1867
Joined: Feb 17, 2002 @ 2:10pm
Location: PocketGamer Towers (New York, Paris, Leeds)


Postby Warren » Oct 25, 2002 @ 11:17pm

Warren
pm Insider
 
Posts: 3140
Joined: Mar 13, 2001 @ 5:49pm


Postby Jadam » Oct 27, 2002 @ 9:39pm

User avatar
Jadam
I'm a STAR!
 
Posts: 3245
Joined: Apr 9, 2002 @ 7:24pm
Location: Stony Brook, NY


PreviousNext

Return to Anything Discussion


Sort


Forum Description

Post all off-topic messages here, almost anything goes.

Moderators:

Dan East, sponge, David Horn, Kevin Gelso, RICoder

Forum permissions

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

cron