Hey Chris...

by **Maf54** » Jun 19, 2003 @ 1:26am

No women that give up their babies to adoption clinics don't.

by **refractor** » Jun 19, 2003 @ 1:27am

Damian:
Sure. In any "gay" case, the couple's gene donor %age is going to be 50%, whether it's f+(f+(m)) or m+(m+(f)). I said the wrong thing before. Fair cop, guv.

James:
Sure, why not? No, no tax break for them. Consider it like adoption. If a woman has a baby and gives it up for adoption, they get no tax breaks (I presume)?

I have no problem having a third person in the reproductive process - it's the same as for an infertile heterosexual couple (where either partner is infertile).

by **RICoder** » Jun 19, 2003 @ 4:23am

by **Maf54** » Jun 19, 2003 @ 4:43am

by **RICoder** » Jun 19, 2003 @ 5:00am

by **Maf54** » Jun 19, 2003 @ 5:19am

by **RICoder** » Jun 19, 2003 @ 6:21am

by **chuck** » Jun 19, 2003 @ 10:07am

by **James S** » Jun 19, 2003 @ 4:21pm

by **Cameron** » Jun 19, 2003 @ 5:42pm

by **Maf54** » Jun 19, 2003 @ 8:20pm

by **James S** » Jun 19, 2003 @ 8:30pm

by **Maf54** » Jun 19, 2003 @ 9:00pm

by **James S** » Jun 19, 2003 @ 9:04pm

by **Cameron** » Jun 19, 2003 @ 9:39pm

yup, moosey made a funny

Hey Chris...

Sort

Forum Description

Moderators:

Forum permissions