I have been persuaded by all the various posts here to reconsider and realize that letting her starve to death is not killing her, but letting her die.
It is an un-naturall, modernistic condition postponing the enevitable.
BUT, as I said before, the fake husband should have divorced her since he moved on to another.
Also, true science never conflicts with religion. For every athiestic view, there is a creationist view. Those that chose the former are usually pessimistic, and narrow minded!
