bush.

by **Brig** » Nov 21, 2003 @ 6:53am

Sick, what's that in his mouth?

by **Andy** » Nov 21, 2003 @ 6:55am

That would be a "holy secretion".

by **James S** » Nov 21, 2003 @ 2:34pm

by **Kzinti** » Nov 21, 2003 @ 10:40pm

by **Chad** » Nov 22, 2003 @ 12:14am

by **Maf54** » Nov 22, 2003 @ 4:50am

It's perfectly within my American right to argue against the president. If no one did then madmen (not saying Bush is one) would go unquestioned.

by **Chad** » Nov 22, 2003 @ 4:52am

sorry just got back from debate class on "How Clinton was better/worse." Sorry for being a little hot-headed and overly zealous...

by **Maf54** » Nov 22, 2003 @ 4:55am

Yeah well keep Clinton out of this convo. This one is about whether Bush is good or not.

by **James S** » Nov 22, 2003 @ 8:12am

Bush isn't doing anything dishonest or criminal. There are no grounds for impeachment.

by **sandmann** » Nov 22, 2003 @ 4:57pm

by **Maf54** » Nov 22, 2003 @ 10:34pm

by **Andy** » Nov 22, 2003 @ 11:02pm

by **Maf54** » Nov 22, 2003 @ 11:17pm

Well since Bush did admit the mistake how to you go about even thinking that there is a possibility of them getting the uranium from Africa? You say that people are wrong for believing CNN over government intelligence and yet you are trusting fanciful conspiracy ideas. The man that was sent over there to investigate the problem came back and said it didn't happen. Thats the information I trust. The things Bush said that are argued against were his biggest arguments for the war. The fact that Saddam bought uranium form Africa would be a big reason for us to go to war with them. So when this came out being false people were shocked. Same with the other WMDs. As I said before. I would back us going into Iraq because Sadam was a bad guy. But Bush came up with more reasons then he could validate.

by **Andy** » Nov 23, 2003 @ 2:19am

by **Maf54** » Nov 23, 2003 @ 6:05am

bush.

Sort

Forum Description

Moderators:

Forum permissions