Page 1 of 2

Geforce FX 5600 VS ATI radeon 9600 XT

PostPosted: Feb 25, 2004 @ 6:25am
by beanburito

PostPosted: Feb 25, 2004 @ 6:37am
by Chris Edwards

PostPosted: Feb 25, 2004 @ 6:10pm
by Fusion

PostPosted: Feb 25, 2004 @ 8:57pm
by sponge

PostPosted: Feb 25, 2004 @ 9:01pm
by Chris Edwards

PostPosted: Feb 25, 2004 @ 9:02pm
by eminefes

PostPosted: Feb 25, 2004 @ 9:48pm
by Dihnekis

PostPosted: Feb 25, 2004 @ 10:15pm
by Fusion

PostPosted: Feb 25, 2004 @ 10:45pm
by damian

PostPosted: Feb 25, 2004 @ 11:23pm
by Alexander

PostPosted: Feb 25, 2004 @ 11:23pm
by Chad

PostPosted: Feb 25, 2004 @ 11:29pm
by damian

PostPosted: Feb 26, 2004 @ 8:17pm
by Mechcommander

PostPosted: Feb 26, 2004 @ 8:36pm
by Fusion

PostPosted: Feb 26, 2004 @ 9:00pm
by Mechcommander

And remember, those benches use a 5600 Ultra, not a regular 5600. So, on average, you will get a 5-10 FPS lower than the review says. The testbed they use is also a power rig: With an Athlon64 FX-51, and 1 GB of RAM. So, don't expect these scores with your testbed, unless, of course, you have something this powerfull.
Prices on both- - $157
- $105
The performance difference between the two is quite large, IMHO, having experience with the 5600 and a 9500 Pro (Which gets nearly the same performance, Sponge should be able to back me on this).