Dark Forces for ppc

by **Nilisco** » Apr 24, 2003 @ 4:30am

that's most likely xp embedded version

by **damian** » Apr 24, 2003 @ 5:07am

by **Maledorito** » Apr 24, 2003 @ 5:11am

by **damian** » Apr 24, 2003 @ 5:44am

It's a 13.3" screen.

And yes, it's ugly.

Actually, just because I'm bored...
(warning, 1600x1200 image)

If that doesn't r0x0r your b0x0rs, you're crazy. And the washed out colors are due to the camera, not the screen.

by **Maledorito** » Apr 24, 2003 @ 3:24pm

by **Dave H** » Apr 24, 2003 @ 3:47pm

by **Guest** » Apr 26, 2003 @ 7:41am

In a recent Tom's Hardware Guide test they ran UT2K3, yes, UT2K3, on a Geforce 4 Ti4600 and a Pentium running at 100Mhz. Not only did Windows XP run, but so did UT2K3, albeit at 2.6 fps.

.

by **damian** » Apr 26, 2003 @ 12:48pm

Yeah, but mine rox0rs more considering it's doing so with software rendering.

Maledorito, you asked how it looks like on the screen, that's not the same as a screenshot.

Yeah, XP runs. The most important thing to have is memory; if my Thinkpad didn't have 224 megs, it would probably crawl.
It's also a tiny bit slow, I have to admit; however, Win2K is perfectly fast. Too lazy to downgrade, though. Besides, in games XP is actually a tiny bit faster, it's just that the UI is a bit slow. But only a bit.

Besides, my PII with 512k cache ownz0rs ANY processor with equivalent clock speed. Maybe not a PowerPC, but Macs just plain suck so it all balances out.

by **(TSC)Bender** » Apr 26, 2003 @ 6:04pm

Ah the good ole days. Unreal actually got me hooked on FPS'. I think ill replay it again

Dark Forces for ppc

Sort

Forum Description

Moderators:

Forum permissions