wierd benchmarks

by **Jadam** » May 6, 2002 @ 5:59am

... ok

How come in lots of VObenchmarks, the Casio E-200 does so much better than all the other PocketPC's in the graphics department???? are they really any different in say PocketQuake or in emulators??? they get like 60, while iPaqs get like 6 or something, heh, my vox gets 13!!!

by **James S** » May 6, 2002 @ 9:30pm

by **R0B** » May 6, 2002 @ 9:31pm

by **James S** » May 6, 2002 @ 10:53pm

Ya, the speed at which a device blits to the display isn't all important. And the speed at which it can draw triangles and text doesn't matter at all, unless you want to play Poccer!
*everyone laughs*

by **TechMage** » May 7, 2002 @ 3:47am

*at Moose's stupidity*

by **Jadam** » May 7, 2002 @ 4:37am

would there be any difference though??? the ipaqs/ all of them/ scored 8.5 , the Maestro/e570/HP 568 scored 12.15, and the NEC/Casio E-200 scored 57. in GFX speed. is there really any difference

by **ingallsj** » May 7, 2002 @ 6:16pm

The most deceiving benchmark is the battery life one. They must test it on minimum backlight while just sitting there with the Today screen only. :roll:

by **accolon** » May 7, 2002 @ 8:58pm

by **ingallsj** » May 7, 2002 @ 9:21pm

wierd benchmarks

wierd benchmarks

Sort

Forum Description

Moderators:

Forum permissions